The how, where, when and why of photographic images taken by Karl S Mainprize, a fine art landscape photographer who lives near Scarborough on the North Yorkshire Coast.
09 July 2011 - Why do we do it to ourselves?
![]() |
Filey Brigg sunrise |
So why did I get up so early knowing I will be tired for the next couple of days? Whilst getting there I asked this constantly, especially when the alarm clock went off, but once I was there I knew the answer and returned fulfilled. Then when I viewed the images on my computer I knew that in a couple of days I will do it all again.
![]() |
Peeping over the horizon |
21 June - an excursion into colour
![]() |
Scalby Rocks I Canon 5D2 24-105L |
19 June 2011 - Dalby Forest
![]() |
Staindale Lake |
The family and I spent a day at Dalby Forest and after lunch took a walk around The Bridestones.
![]() |
Path to Bridestones |
![]() |
Power of trees |
![]() |
Bracken breaks through |
![]() |
The Bridestones I |
How do you like your coffee?
![]() |
Watching IX Sheringham, Norfolk Taken with a Lensbaby Composer with single glass lens on a 5D2. |
Having just spent a week away with the family allowing 7 days in a row of image making I have to say that I still enjoy my photography, despite having moved genres and moved through several styles. I take pictures first and foremost for myself, and my pictures give me pleasure. In the past I wanted my pictures to be appreciated by others and generate income. I used to sell bird and nature photos all over the world, then I changed to insect photography and still achieved a reasonable amount of sales.
Since then I evolved into landscape photography and got up at ungodly hours to try to create Cornish pastiches. The sales continued and yet I was unhappy. Finally I moved through intentional camera movement and tilt and shift to the expressive artistic photography that I now enjoy.
I do not take pictures I think others might prefer to see.
Your photographs are unlikely to please everybody, so why try when you have to please your hardest critic - yourself.
![]() |
Beach XXVII Cromer, Norfolk Taken with a Lensbaby Composer with single glass lens on a 5D2. |
In the next week or so I will be uploading a set of the latest shots taken with a digital SLR using various lenses, but mostly Lensbabies or Diana lenses. I know some will love them, but most will be indifferent or hate them, but most importantly they stir the correct emotions in me!
So how do you like yours?
Fascination with the edge
Now we are getting to the silly season. The tourists have flocked to the beach and we locals cannot get near, so early mornings and late nights rule and not due to the sunrise and sunset times. That is why I love inclement weather.
I love the effect the backlit rain has in this image.
The other alternative is to incorporate people into the coastal shots, but not being too keen on portraiture I like to find a way of minimalising the human element. This has been the mainstay of my beach project, depicting man's use of the beach. In many of these shot I try to silhouette the people so they are not identifiable.
The above image was taken with a 'normal' lens ie a 24-105LIS. This has recently been unusual for me as for the last 2 months I have almost uniformly used a Lensbaby - the Composer and the plastic or single glass lens. I shall post on the Lensbaby system on another occasion in the future.
New project uploaded - The beach
I spend a lot of time at the sea as I live near it and it fascinates me. If I have a bad day at work or I want some peace and quiet I go to the coast, however there is often someone else there. Luckily, as a landscape photographer, I am often there at times that are prohibitive to most.
However as I have two young children as a family we spend time on the beach and I have been observing the vast array of different ways that we as humans utilise it. I am trying to capture our use producing fine art black and white photos of the different ways man and his friends occupy ourselves there.
05 January - Art, bigotry and philistines
Yesterday I heard that one of my friends, who is a very talented landscape photographer, had been criticised for trying out new techniques of recording his vision of the world. Recently he has received the accolade of LRPS. He posted to his website some ICM (intentional camera movement) images that are beautiful. They remove the detail and concentrate the mind on the colours and light and their interplay together.
These critics commented on lack of focus (part of the idea of ICM) and I gather were negative about his exploration of new techniques. One of them was a professional photographer who runs photography courses, who should be encouraging promotion of vision and interpretation and not demoralising those that do not wish to continually produce what I call Cornish pastiches. If photography is an art we should aim for diversity and promote different interpretations of the world.
So what is the definition of art? According to Wikipedia:
Art is the product or process of deliberately arranging symbolic elements in a way that influences and affects one or more of the senses, emotions, and intellect.
So if you look at someone else's images and you do not like them ask yourself why and then be glad that they have stirred up an emotion in you, because that is art. When I look at many of the images that photographers create now I see Cornish pastiches and I hear people say "Isn't that nice." well nice is neither here nor there and it certainly is not art.
Those that drive for us all to constantly mimic or aspire to the art of the masters, should be encouraging development of personal vision and interpretation, after all if I wanted to see Joe Cornish like pictures all the time I would actually visit his website, or better still his gallery in Northallerton, where I could marvel at the genius and ask myself why are his images more aesthetically pleasing than all of those mimics that I see all over the web on a daily basis.
So those critics of my friend should perhaps look at their own websites and ask whether their images stir up emotions, or do they generally get the response "That's nice!".
Here are some images that I have taken in the last few months that have received comments saying that they are fantastic and yet other comments have said the same image is rubbish. All comments please me because that means someone need stimulated by them in a positive or negative way.




These images can all be found on my website.
These critics commented on lack of focus (part of the idea of ICM) and I gather were negative about his exploration of new techniques. One of them was a professional photographer who runs photography courses, who should be encouraging promotion of vision and interpretation and not demoralising those that do not wish to continually produce what I call Cornish pastiches. If photography is an art we should aim for diversity and promote different interpretations of the world.
So what is the definition of art? According to Wikipedia:
Art is the product or process of deliberately arranging symbolic elements in a way that influences and affects one or more of the senses, emotions, and intellect.
So if you look at someone else's images and you do not like them ask yourself why and then be glad that they have stirred up an emotion in you, because that is art. When I look at many of the images that photographers create now I see Cornish pastiches and I hear people say "Isn't that nice." well nice is neither here nor there and it certainly is not art.
Those that drive for us all to constantly mimic or aspire to the art of the masters, should be encouraging development of personal vision and interpretation, after all if I wanted to see Joe Cornish like pictures all the time I would actually visit his website, or better still his gallery in Northallerton, where I could marvel at the genius and ask myself why are his images more aesthetically pleasing than all of those mimics that I see all over the web on a daily basis.
So those critics of my friend should perhaps look at their own websites and ask whether their images stir up emotions, or do they generally get the response "That's nice!".
Here are some images that I have taken in the last few months that have received comments saying that they are fantastic and yet other comments have said the same image is rubbish. All comments please me because that means someone need stimulated by them in a positive or negative way.




These images can all be found on my website.
04 January - The Humber Bridge at New Year

Spent the New Year with family in Hull and managed a walk by the Humber Bridge in Hessle. What a magnificent achievement this bridge is.
I only took the Canon G12 and did several shots playing with ICM. At one stage the sun almost appeared and provided a few minutes of amazing light.
These two images were uploaded onto my iPad, with only the ICM above having been processed with the Photoshop Express app, brightening it a little and adding a frame.

Location:Home
Last photos of 2010
Having gone away for the New Year here are the photos of the last trip to the coast in 2010. Scarborough North Bay was lit by early morning light and there was at last variation in the cloud, with the mist having cleared here.
These are three different types of image depicting the variation in my photography over the last year. The first was taken with the intention of being a minimalist monochrome, but when I converted it to black and white in Lightroom, I realised that the cloud formation was far to good to develop high key and therefore the above image emerged.
The second image is part of my interface series and is a long exposure of the sea and sky.
The third is an ICM (intentional camera movement), which I often use when humans or their impact on the environment are in the shot. This simplifies the landscape and allows the play of light and colours to come through. The first two were taken with a Canon 7D and the last was with a Canon G12 compact.
I hope you all have a Happy New Year and that yours is as prosperous as I hope mine will be.
![]() |
Resilient |
![]() |
Interface VIII |
![]() |
From road to sea |
The second image is part of my interface series and is a long exposure of the sea and sky.
The third is an ICM (intentional camera movement), which I often use when humans or their impact on the environment are in the shot. This simplifies the landscape and allows the play of light and colours to come through. The first two were taken with a Canon 7D and the last was with a Canon G12 compact.
I hope you all have a Happy New Year and that yours is as prosperous as I hope mine will be.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)